Growing Artificial Societies — Epstein & Axtell (1996) / Beinhocker Ch. 5
Start with a landscape of "sugar" — a renewable resource distributed in two mountain peaks. Drop hundreds of agents onto this world, each with slightly different abilities: some can see farther, some burn less energy. Give them one simple rule: look around, move to the richest empty spot you can see, eat. That's it. No exploitation, no institutions, no cunning. Yet within a few dozen ticks, the egalitarian utopia collapses into staggering inequality. This is the profound lesson of Sugarscape: inequality is not a bug — it is an emergent property of heterogeneous agents on an uneven landscape.
In The Origin of Wealth, Beinhocker uses Sugarscape to demolish a common misconception: that inequality requires exploitation, corruption, or unfair institutions. Even in a world of perfectly simple, identical rules — where no agent can cheat, steal, or collude — heterogeneity alone produces inequality. The lesson: inequality is the default emergent state of any system with heterogeneous agents and uneven resources. Reducing it requires deliberate, sustained intervention.